14 June Duke-Margolis workshop + A taxonomy for non-traditional (non-Fleming) antimicrobials

Dear All: (18 June addendum: the materials from the meeting are now posted!)

First, planning continues apace for the 14 June Duke-Margolis workshop on non-traditional products. There is now a link for registration, confirmation that the event is going to be webcast, and a draft agenda. Mark your calendar now to attend either in person or via the webcast!

Second, I would like to expand a bit on my very brief 23 Apr 2018 post on the discussion of non-traditional products at the CARB-X– and GARDP-sponsored ECCMID symposium on regulatory issues. The full talk can be found here and was based on conversations with multiple colleagues (see list on slide 4). The key ideas are:

1. “Non-traditional” covers a lot of territory and it is helpful to refine the idea by envisioning a continuum for antimicrobial therapeutic products that runs from Fleming to non-Fleming products:

  • Fleming: A product that is like a penicillin in that it has the spectrum for a defined syndrome and the speed required to be suitable as standalone therapy (SSSS, if you like acronyms). Importantly, this means that standard non-inferiority trial designs can be used as the basis for registration.
  • Non-Fleming = Everything else = Non-traditional. This can include phage, antibodies, small molecules, large molecules, microbiome … it’s non-Fleming because it lacks one or more of the spectrum-syndrome-speed-standalone properties of a Fleming .

2. Digging more deeply, it then becomes helpful to replace the ambiguous terms alternative to antibioticspotentiator, and enhancer with four functional archetypes for the non-Fleming therapeutic products: Create, Transform, Enhance, and Restore:

Picture

To emphasize, this taxonomy of non-Fleming antimicrobial products is entirely functional:  physical nature of the product (large, small, phage, etc.) is not relevant! Rather, the behavior of the product defines the opportunities it brings and the challenges it faces. You should review the entire talk, but here’s a quick summary:

  • The archetypes Create and Enhance have the advantage of often being really novel, but the challenges of often being narrow, not standalone, requiring superiority study designs, and not being able to use an MIC as the basis for PK-PD thinking.
  • Conversely, the archetypes Transform and Restore have the advantages of leveraging a known component, of being able to leverage an MIC for PK-PD, and often being suitable for standalone development despite the challenge of sometimes being very narrow in terms of spectrum.

3. Agents for prevention are a distinct category and the Fleming/Non-Fleming idea is really not relevant. Instead, the problem is the general challenge of showing an advantage over best Standard of Care. See the slide deck for a specific example. 

OK, that’s enough for now … I look forward to the conversation on 14 June where we will hopefully expand further on the challenges around non-traditional products!

All best wishes, –jr

John H. Rex, MD | Chief Medical Officer, F2G Ltd. | Expert-in-Residence, Wellcome Trust. Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx. See past newsletters and subscribe for the future: https://13.43.35.2/blog/

Upcoming meetings of interest to the AMR community:

Share

EPA (part 5): Interagency Framework on AMR Risks of Antibacterial and Antifungal Pesticides

This is the fifth of a 5-part newsletter series. There is an initial 27 Sep 2023 newsletter introducing the EPA concept note, a second (28 Sep 2023) newsletter that expands on the EPA concept note, a third (12 Jan 2024) newsletter about ending the use of streptomycin spray on citrus crops, and a 4th newsletter (27 Jan 2024) containing some additional resources. Dear All, Excitingly, the US EPA

HLM on AMR at UNGA: The end of the beginning

Aside: Please refer to our UNGA 2024 webpage for additional post-HLM notes and updates. Dear All (and with thanks to Damiano for co-authoring), Last week in NYC, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) and all its surrounding activities created a lot of energy (not to mention a giant traffic jam)! After a series of side meetings

Without action, AMR costs go from $66b to $159b/yr by 2050

Dear All, A new paper from Anthony McDonnell and a team led by the Center for Global Development extends estimates of the health-related impact of AMR (e.g., death) to a consideration of the economic ($) cost of AMR. To follow the plot, here are the links you will need: The new paper: “Forecasting the Fallout

UN TV: You can watch the AMR High-Level Meeting at UNGA

Dear All, The AMR HLM (High-Level Meeting) at the UN General Assembly starts at 10a ET today.  You can watch it here on UN TV: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11knc6w2t Addendum: It’s available for replay at that same link. See also the 1 Oct 2024 newsletter for a review of the HLM. All best wishes, –jr John H. Rex, MD

Scroll to Top