Updated Pew Pipeline analysis of both traditional and non-traditional antimicrobial agents in development

Dear All:

To start the new year, I’ve learned that Pew has updated their pipeline analysis. First released in Feb 2014, it has been steadily updated ever since. This newest analysis has a data cut-off of Sep 2017 and covers both traditional antibiotics as well as non-traditional products. All the links you need are just below my signature, but let me point out a few highlights:

  • Separate commentaries are provided on the state of the traditional and non-traditional pipeline.
  • An excellent infographic is provided. Here’s a little piece of it. Combined with the idea that at most 1 in 5 of these products will reach registration, you have a very scary story indeed
Picture
  • As you know, WHO has also recently published a pipeline analysis. The two analyses are complementary and we have a joint blog from the organizations.
  • Pew’s analysis extends that of WHO by covering non-traditional products such as vaccines, microbiome products, immune enhancers, and more. There are 32 of these underway right now. As these are challenging and high-risk products to develop, I am glad to see this level of effort.
  • If you are interested in doing your own analytics, note that the pipeline charts are interactive and can be sorted by development phase, drug class, pathogen coverage, and more. You can also download past versions of the pipeline tables.

Core message: We have a pipeline, but it remains VERY thin. Let’s all get busy and see what can be developed to address the problem of antibiotic resistance!

All best wishes, –jr

John H. Rex, MD | Chief Medical Officer, F2G Ltd. | Expert-in-Residence, Wellcome Trust. Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx. See past newsletters and subscribe for the future: https://13.43.35.2/blog/

Pew’s Dec 2017 Traditional/Small Molecule Antibiotics Analyses

Pew’s Dec 2017 Nontraditional Products Analyses

Upcoming meetings of interest to the AMR community:

Share

HLM on AMR at UNGA: The end of the beginning

Dear All (and with thanks to Damiano for co-authoring), Last week in NYC, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) and all its surrounding activities created a lot of energy (not to mention a giant traffic jam)! After a series of side meetings designed to build momentum, we reached the Thursday 26 Sep High-Level Meeting (HLM) on AMR

Without action, AMR costs go from $66b to $159b/yr by 2050

Dear All, A new paper from Anthony McDonnell and a team led by the Center for Global Development extends estimates of the health-related impact of AMR (e.g., death) to a consideration of the economic ($) cost of AMR. To follow the plot, here are the links you will need: The new paper: “Forecasting the Fallout

UN TV: You can watch the AMR High-Level Meeting at UNGA

Dear All, The AMR HLM (High-Level Meeting) at the UN General Assembly starts at 10a ET today.  You can watch it here on UN TV: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11knc6w2t Addendum: It’s available for replay at that same link. See also the 1 Oct 2024 newsletter for a review of the HLM. All best wishes, –jr John H. Rex, MD

PACE: A £5m funding round for diagnostics

Dear All, The peri-UNGA week is generating a lot of activity! Having about a year ago launched a £30m fund for support of AMR innovation with a call for therapeutic projects (30 Oct 2023 newsletter; I am told that awards will be announced soon), PACE (Pathways to Antimicrobial Clinical Efficacy, a joint project of LifeArc,

Scroll to Top